Acta Gymnica e2021.006 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2021.006

The relative age effect is more than just participation bias in badminton

Mert Bilgiç1, Erhan Devrilmez2
1 Faculty of Sport Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
2 Faculty of Sport Sciences, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey

Background: Annual age grouping is a widely used strategy to allocate players to age categories for more equal and fair opportunities considering the developmental differences. Although it is a well-intended strategy, certain (dis)advantages occur because of the subtle age-related differences within the same age groups.

Objective: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relative age effect among badminton players reaching the podium in the last three consecutive European U15, U17 and Junior (U19) Badminton Championships.

Methods: A total of 288 medal owners from 20 countries were evaluated in the study. Chi-square (χ2) goodness-of-fit tests were used to compare the obtained birth month distributions across the quartiles (Q), and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated in order to compare quartiles with each other.

Results: Statistically significant relative age effects were determined favouring relatively older athletes in the total sample (χ2 = 82.278, p < .001). Statistically significant distribution differences were noted in both singles and doubles categories in total (χ2 = 18.778, p < .001; χ2 = 63.815, p < .001, respectively). Striking findings were determined in Q1-Q4 and Q2-Q4 comparisons as players in Q1 and Q2 were more than five and four times as likely to reach the podium than players in Q4, respectively.

Conclusions: Results of this study confirm the presence of relative age effect among award-winning badminton players which goes beyond the classical participation trends findings, and stress the importance of the issue for talent development, selection and success.

Keywords: annual age-grouping, success, youth, racket sports

Received: October 1, 2020; Revised: February 15, 2021; Accepted: February 28, 2021; Published online: April 12, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bilgiç, M., & Devrilmez, E. (2021). The relative age effect is more than just participation bias in badminton. Acta Gymnica, 51, Article e2021.006. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2021.006
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arrieta, H., Torres-Unda, J., Gil, S. M., & Irazusta, J. (2016). Relative age effect and performance in the U16, U18 and U20 European Basketball Championships. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(16), 1530-1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1122204 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Barnsley, R. H., Thompson, A. H., & Barnsley, P. E. (1985). Hockey success and birthdate: The relative age effect. Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation Journal, 51(8), 23-28.
    3. Baxter-Jones, A. D. (1995). Growth and development of young athletes. Should competition levels be age related? Sports Medicine, 20(2), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199520020-00001 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Beunen, G., & Malina, R. M. (2008). Growth and biologic maturation: Relevance to athletic performance. In H. Hebestreit & O. Bar-Or (Eds.), The young athlete (pp. 3-17). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696255.ch1 Go to original source...
    5. Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. A. (2019). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (6th ed.). Human Kinetics. Go to original source...
    6. Bruner, M. W., Macdonald, D. J., Pickett, W., & Côté, J. (2011). Examination of birthplace and birthdate in world junior ice hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(12), 1337-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.597419 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Brustio, P. R., Kearney, P. E., Lupo, C., Ungureanu, A. N., Mulasso, A., Rainoldi, A., & Boccia, G. (2019). Relative age influences performance of world-class track and field athletes even in the adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01395 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual age-grouping and athlete development: A meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Medicine, 39(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Delorme, N., & Raspaud, M. (2009). The relative age effect in young French basketball players: A study on the whole population. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 19(2), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00781.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Edgar, S., & O'Donoghue, P. (2005). Season of birth distribution of elite tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(10), 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021468 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Faber, I. R., Liu, M., Cece, V., Jie, R., Martinent, G., Schorer, J., & Elferink-Gemser, M. T. (2020). The interaction between within-year and between-year effects across ages in elite table tennis in international and national contexts - A further exploration of relative age effects in sports. High Ability Studies, 31(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1596071 Go to original source...
    12. Faber, I. R., Martinent, G., Cece, V., & Schorer, J. (2020). Are performance trajectories associated with relative age in French top 100 youth table tennis players? - A longitudinal approach. PLoS ONE, 15(4), Article e0231926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231926 Go to original source...
    13. Ferriz-Valero, A., García Martínez, S., Olaya-Cuartero, J., & García-Jaén, M. (2020). Sustainable sport development: The influence of competitive grouping and relative age on the performance of young triathletes. Sustainability, 12(17), Article 6792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176792 Go to original source...
    14. Ferriz-Valero, A., Sellés-Pérez, S., García-Jaén, M., & Cejuela, R. (2020). Efecto de la edad relativa para el desarrollo del talento en jóvenes triatletas [Relative age effect for talents' development in young triathletes]. Retos, 37, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.67384 Go to original source...
    15. Ford, P. R., & Williams, M. A. (2011). No relative age effect in the birth dates of award-winning athletes in male professional teamsports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 570-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599790 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Franks, A. M., Williams, A. M., Reilly, T., & Nevill, A. (1999). Talent identification in elite youth soccer players: Physical and physiological characteristics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(10), 812.
    17. Gao, R. Y. (2017). A comparison between Talent Identification and Development (TID) for badminton in China and the UK. [Master's thesis, The University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom]. Stirling Online Research Repository. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/25675#.YAQrVXYzbIU
    18. Gerdin, G., Hedberg, M., & Hageskog, C. (2018). Relative age effect in Swedish male and female tennis players born in 1998-2001. Sports, 6(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020038 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Grondin, S., Deshaies, P., & Nault, L. P. (1984). Trimestre de naissance et participation au hockey et au volleyball [Birth term and participation in hockey and volleyball]. Le revue Québécoise de l'activité physique, 2, 97-103.
    20. Hancock, D. J., Adler, A. L., & Côté, J. (2013). A proposed theoretical model to explain relative age effects in sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(6), 630-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.775352 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., & van Winckel, J. (1998). The influence of relative age on success and dropout in male soccer players. American Journal of Human Biology, 10(6), 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1998)10:63.0.CO;2-1 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Helsen, W. F., van Winckel, J., & Williams, A. M. (2005). The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021310 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Jayanthi, N. A., Dechert, A., Durazo, R., & Luke, A. (2011). Training and specialization risks in junior elite tennis players. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 16(1), 14-20.
    24. Malina, R. M., Bouchard, C., & Bar-Or, O. (2004). Growth, maturation, and physical activity (2nd ed.) Human Kinetics. Go to original source...
    25. Malina, R. M., Peña Reyes, M. E., Eisenmann, J. C., Horta, L., Rodrigues, J., & Miller, R. (2000). Height, mass and skeletal maturity of elite Portuguese soccer players aged 11-16 years. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120069 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Malina, R. M., Ribeiro, B., Aroso, J., & Cumming, S. P. (2007). Characteristics of youth soccer players aged 13-15 years classified by skill level. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(5), 290-295. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.031294 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Musch, J., & Grondin, S. (2001). Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: A review of the relative age effect in sport. Developmental Review, 21(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0516 Go to original source...
    28. Nakata, H., & Sakamoto, K. (2011). Relative age effect in Japanese male athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(2), 570-574. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.10.11.pms.113.5.570-574 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Nakata, H., & Sakamoto, K. (2012). Sex differences in relative age effects among Japanese athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115(1), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.05.17.pms.115.4.179-186 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Raschner, C., Müller, L., & Hildebrandt, C. (2012). The role of a relative age effect in the first winter Youth Olympic Games in 2012. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(15), 1038-1043. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091535 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Romann, M., & Cobley, S. (2015). Relative age effects in athletic sprinting and corrective adjustments as a solution for their removal. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0122988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122988 Go to original source...
    32. Smith, K. L., Weir, P. L., Till, K., Romann, M., & Cobley, S. (2018). Relative age effects across and within female sport contexts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(6), 1451-1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0890-8 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Turnnidge, J., Hancock, D. J., & Côté, J. (2012). The influence of birth date and place of development on youth sport participation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(2), 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12002 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Vincent, J., & Glamser, F. D. (2006). Gender differences in the relative age effect among US olympic development program youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(4), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500244655 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Wattie, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015). The relative age effect in sport: A developmental systems model. Sports Medicine, 45(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0248-9 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. Weir, P. L., Smith, K. L., Paterson, C., & Horton, S. (2010). Canadian women's ice hockey evidence of a relative age effect. Talent Development and Excellence, 2(2), 209-217.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content