Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2013 43(3): 37-47 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2013.016

Selected personality traits and achievement motivation in university students of physical culture, education and natural sciences

Martin Sigmund1, Jana Kvintová2, Iva Dostálová1, Zdeněk Hamřík1
1 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc
2 Faculty of Education, Palacky University, Olomouc

Background: Understanding personality variables and other important psychological traits in the university population appears topical particularly with respect to personality, motivation, health as well as overall academic achievement. A significant role is played by correlations of the monitored variables in relation to selected study specialization.

Objective: The main objective of the present study is to extend the knowledge on selected personality traits and the level of achievement motivation in a specific group of university students with respect to the diversity of their study specialization.

Methods: The study included a total of 522 students from Palacký University. These were students from the Faculty of Physical Culture (n = 118), Faculty of Education (n = 218) and Faculty of Science (n = 186). In terms of age, the study focused on young adults aged 19 to 26. In the research, psychodiagnostic methods were used to perform diagnostics and to fulfil the overall research plan. All diagnostic methods used are fully standardized and contain domestic normative values. We monitored variables such as personality, achievement motivation and achievement anxiety. Statistical result processing was conducted using the Statgraphics programme v. 9.0. Result processing was made using parametric as well as non-parametric statistical methods (Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman's correlation).

Results: University students specialized in physical culture showed the highest values of extraversion and psychoticism, and clearly the lowest values of neuroticism compared to the students of education and natural sciences. The highest values of openness were observed in the students specialized in sports. In terms of the overall achievement motivation related to study specialization, almost identical values were observed. However, the students of physical culture showed significantly lower values of achievement debilitating anxiety than the students of education and natural sciences (p ≤ .001).

Conclusion: The present study deals with a psychological analysis of personality traits and achievement motivation in a sample of university students based on various study specializations. It appears that there are variances in personality traits among students of physical culture, education and natural sciences. On the contrary, in case of achievement motivation, the differences are negligible. The study falls within the category of differential diagnostics and the results can be applied in university psychological counselling.

Keywords: psychology, academic diversity, adultus, sport

Prepublished online: September 30, 2013; Published: June 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sigmund, M., Kvintová, J., Dostálová, I., & Hamřík, Z. (2013). Selected personality traits and achievement motivation in university students of physical culture, education and natural sciences. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 43(3), 37-47. doi: 10.5507/ag.2013.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aghajanipour, H., & Homayouni, A. (2010). Personality factors related to emerge of stress in university students. European Psychiatry, 25(1), 875. Go to original source...
    2. Ahadi, B., & Narimani, M. (2010). Study of realtionships between personality traits and education. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8(3), 53-60.
    3. Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Psychologie (2nd rev. ed.). Praha: Victoria Publishing.
    4. Bedrnová, E., & Nový, I. (2002). Psychologie a sociologie řízení. Praha: Management Press.
    5. Blatný, M. (2001). Osobnostní determinanty sebehodnocení a životní spokojenosti: Mezipohlavní rozdíly. Československá psychologie, 45(6), 385-392.
    6. Buddeberg-Fischer, B., Stamm, M., Buddeberg, C., & Klaghofer, R. (2010). Chronic stress experience in young physicians: Impact of person and workplace-related factors. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 83(4), 373-379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Bunevicius, A., Katkute, A., & Bunevicius, R. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical students and in humanities students: Relationship with big-five personality dimensions and vulnerability to stress. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(6), 494-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057-1068. Go to original source...
    9. Chen, C. K., Lin, C., Wang, S. H., & Hou, T. H. (2009). A study of job stress, stress coping strategies, and job satisfaction for nurses working in middle-level hospital operating rooms. Journal of Nursing Research, 17, 199-211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    11. Clark, M. H., & Schroth, C. A. (2010). Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students. Learning and individual differences, 20, 19-24. Go to original source...
    12. Green, J., Nelson, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh H. W. (2006). The causal ordering of self-concept and academic motivation and its effect on academic achievement. International Education Journal, 7(4), 534-546.
    13. Hamaideh, S. H. (2011). Stressors and reactions to stressors among university students. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57(1), 69-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Higgins, D. M., Peterson, J. B., Lee, A. G. M., & Pihl, R. O. (2007). Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, Big Five personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 298-319. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Hošek, V. (1986). Motivace sportovního tréninku. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
    16. Hřebíčková, M., & Urbánek, T. (2001). NEO-pětifaktorový osobnostní inventář. Praha: Testcentrum.
    17. Kohoutek, R. (1998). Osobnost a sebepoznání studentů. Brno: Akademické nakladatelství CERM.
    18. Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557-567. Go to original source...
    19. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47-52. Go to original source...
    20. Kožený, J., Höschl, C., & Tišanská, L. (2002). Akademický výkon a úspěch v 1. a 2. ročníku integrovaného studia medicíny na 3. LF UK: Prediktivní potenciál přijímacího řízení [Academic performance and achievement in the 1st and 2nd year of integrated study of medicine at the 3rd LF UK: The predictive potential of the admission process]. Československá psychologie, 46(3), 208-218.
    21. Linhartová, D. (2008). Vysokoškolská psychologie [College psychology]. Brno: MZLU.
    22. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327. Go to original source...
    23. Lu, L. (1994). University transition: Major and minor life stressors, personality characteristics and mental health. Psychological Medicine, 24(1), 81-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Margitics, F., & Pauwlik, Z. (2008). Gender differences in proneness to depression. Psychiatria Hungarica, 23(6), 444-454. Go to PubMed...
    25. Muchinsky, P. M. (2000). Psychology applied to work. Belmont: Wadsworth.
    26. Nakonečný, M. (1992). Motivace pracovního jednání a její řízení [Motivation of work negotiation and its management]. Praha: Management Press.
    27. Orosová, O., & Gajdošová, B. (2009). Individuálne a sociálne faktory fajčenia cigariet a konzumácie alkoholu u vybraných skupín vysokoškolských študentov [Individual and social factors, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption in selected groups of university students]. Československá psychologie, 53(6), 600-611.
    28. Pardel, T., Maršálová, L., & Hrabovská, A. (1984). Dotazník motivácie výkonu - príručka [Questionnaire of performance motivation - guide]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy.
    29. Petrová, A. (1995). Sebeobraz a sebepojetí ve struktuře osobnosti adolescentů. Disertační práce, Univerzita Palackého, Filozofická fakulta, Olomouc.
    30. Plháková, A., & Reiterová, E. (2010). Rozdíly v pěti dimenzích osobnosti a sociální inteligenci mezi studenty exaktních a humanitních věd. Československá psychologie, 54(2), 147-159.
    31. Provazníková, H., Štullerová, N., Provazník, K., & Hynčica, V. (1999). Vliv studijních a životních podmínek na zdravotní stav a studijní úspěchy vysokoškoláků. Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťata, 25(6), 501-511.
    32. Robbins, S. P., & Decenzo, D. A. (2001). Fundamentals of management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    33. Ross, S. R., Rausch, M. K., & Canada, K. E. (2003). Competition and cooperation in the five factor model: Individual differences in achievement orientation. The Journal of Psychology, 137(4), 323-337. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Senka, J., Kováč, T., & Matejík, M. (1992). Eysenckove osobnostné dotazníky pre dospelých - príručka [Eysenck's personality inventories for adults - guide]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.
    35. Slepička, P., Hošek, V., & Hátlová, B. (2006). Psychologie sportu [Sport psychology]. Praha: Karolinum.
    36. Stackeová, D. (2010). Perspektivy tématu výkonové motivace v kinantropologii [Perspectives of performance motivation in kinanthropology]. Česká kinatropologie, 14(1), 9-18.
    37. Stallman, H. M. (2008). Prevalence of psychological distress in university students - implications for service delivery. Australian Family Physician, 37(8), 673-677. Go to PubMed...
    38. Štikař, J., Rymeš, M., Riegel, K., & Hoskovec, J. (2003). Psychologie ve světě práce [Psychology in the world of work]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
    39. Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2011). Research methods in physical activity (6th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    40. Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 367-378. Go to original source...
    41. Walsh, J. M., Feeney, C., Hussey, J., & Donnellan, C. (2010). Sources of stress and psychological morbidity among undergraduate physiotherapy students. Physiotherapy, 96(3), 206-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content