Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2012 42(3): 7-16 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2012.013

Movement Assessment Battery for Children - second edition: Cross-cultural comparison between 11-15 year old children from the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom

Rudolf Psotta1, Jan Hendl2
1 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc
2 Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague

Background: With the exception of specific clinical methods, no widely used diagnostic tool for motor development assessment of children exists in the Czech Republic. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children - second edition (MABC-2) seems to be one the most developed instruments for children's motor coordination assessment. However, to use it in the Czech population of children in educational and psychological practice including physical education, the cross-validity of the test battery needs to be examined.

Objective: The aim of the study was to make a comparative analysis of performance in motor tasks of the MABC-2 measured in a Czech sample of 11-15 year old children and the United Kingdom (UK) normative sample from which the norms of the MABC-2 were established.

Methods: The Czech sample of 11-15 year old children (total n = 589; 310 boys, 279 girls) formed from a random selection of schools from all the geographical regions of the Czech Republic and all size categories of municipalities, was tested by the MABC-2. The results were compared to the performance of the UK normative sample of the same age (n = 344) reported in the MABC-2 Examiner's Manual by Henderson et al. (2007). For this comparative analysis, the effects size coefficient (d) and the z-test were used.

Results: From three manual dexterity tests of the MABC-2, mean performance of the Czech sample in the Drawing trail test was shown to be significantly higher than the mean performance of the UK sample in all the age groups of both genders (d = 0.68-1.32; p < 0.01). On the other hand, the Czech sample demonstrated no significant differences of performance in the gross motor coordination tests as compared to the performance of the UK sample. Regarding balance assessment, performance in the Two-board balance test (static balance) was found to be significantly higher in almost all the age groups of Czech girls (d = 0.52-0.70, p < 0.01), while Czech boys showed a significantly higher performance only in the Zig-zag hopping test (dynamic balance) at the ages of 14 and 15 years, as compared to the UK sample. In 1.9% of boys and 0.7% of girls in the Czech sample significant motor difficulties were identified (total test score ≤5th percentile).

Conclusions: The study revealed that the MABC-2 is valid only for assessment of gross motor coordination in Czech children, but not for assessment of manual dexterity and balance. Before the use of this test battery for Czech children for both practical and research purposes, an adjustment of the norms is needed for the Drawing trail test, Two-board balance test and Zig-zag hopping test.

Keywords: Motor coordination, test, manual dexterity, aiming, catching, balance, child

Prepublished online: September 30, 2012; Published: June 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Psotta, R., & Hendl, J. (2012). Movement Assessment Battery for Children - second edition: Cross-cultural comparison between 11-15 year old children from the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 42(3), 7-16. doi: 10.5507/ag.2012.013
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Brown, T., & Lalor, A. (2009). The movement assessment battery for children - second edition (MABC-2): A review and critique. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 29(1), 86-103. Go to original source...
    2. Burton, A. W., & Rodgerson, R. W. (2001). New perspectives on the assessment of movement skills and motor abilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 347-365. Go to original source...
    3. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New York: Academic Press. Go to original source...
    4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). DSM-IV- TR Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. Washington DC: APA.
    5. Ellinoudis, T., Kourtessis, T., & Kiparissis, M. (2008a). Suitability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children in Greece: Comparison between a Greek sample and the North-American normative sample of 9 and 11 years old children. International Journal of Health Science, 1(4), 132-137.
    6. Ellinoudis, T., Kourtessis, T., Kiparissis, M., Kampas, A., & Mavromatis, G. (2008). Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC): Measuring the construct validity for Greece in a sample of elementary school aged children. International Journal of Health Science, 1(2), 56-60.
    7. Frömel, K., Novosad, J., & Svozil, Z. (1999). Pohybová aktivita a sportovní zájmy mládeže. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
    8. Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London: The Psychological Corporation.
    9. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2. London: Harcourt Assessment. Go to original source...
    10. Kadesjo, B., & Gillberg, C. (1999). Developmental coordination disorder in Swedish 7 year old children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(7), 820-828. Go to original source...
    11. Kokštejn, J. (2011). Pohybová aktivita dětí s motorickými obtížemi. Doctoral thesis, Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Prague.
    12. Larkin, D., & Rose, E. (2005). Assessment of developmental coordination disorder. In D. Sugden, & M. Chambers (Eds.), Children with developmental coordination disorder (pp. 135-154). London, Philadephia: Whurr Publishers.
    13. Lee, A. J., & Lin, W. H. (2007). The influence of gender and somatotype on single-leg upright standing postural stability in children. Journal of Biomechanics, 23(3), 173-179. Go to original source...
    14. Maeland, A. F. (1992). Identification of children with motor coordination problems. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9(4), 330-342. Go to original source...
    15. Miyahara, M., Tsujii, M., Hanai, T., Jongmans, M., Barnett, A., Henderson. S. E., Nakanisha, K., & Kageyama, H. (1998). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Human Movement Science, 17(4-5), 679-697. Go to original source...
    16. Nolan, L., Grigorenko, A., & Thorstensson, A. (2005). Balance control: Sex and age differences in 9 to 16 year olds. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47(7), 449-454. Go to original source...
    17. Rösblad, B., & Gard, L. (1998). The assessment of children with developmental coordination disorder in Sweden: A preliminary investigation of the suitability of the Movement ABC. Human Movement Science, 17(4-5), 711-721. Go to original source...
    18. Ruiz, L. M., Graupera, J. L., Gutiérrez, M., & Miyahara, M. (2003). The assessment of motor coordination in children with the Movement ABC test: A comparative study among Japan, USA and Spain. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 15(1), 22-35.
    19. Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M. (1998). Movement ABC: Nederlandse handleiding. Lisse: Swets en Zeitinger.
    20. Wuang, Y. P., Su, J. H., & Su, C. Y. (2012). Reliability and responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - second edition test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54(2), 160-165. Go to original source...
    21. Yoon, D. Y., Scott, K., Hill, M. N., Levitt, N. S., & Lambert, E. V. (2006). Review of three tests of motor proficiency in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102(2), 543-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content