Acta Gymnica, 2018 (vol. 48), issue 1

Acta Gymnica 2018, 48(1):27-35 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2018.005

The examination of the psychometric properties of the Turkish Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports

Erman Öncü1, Deborah L. Feltz2, Cathy D. Lirgg3, Bülent Gürbüz4
1 School of Physical Education and Sport, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey;
2 College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA;
3 College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; and
4 Faculty of Sport Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Background: Current research has demonstrated a consistent and positive relationship between collective efficacy and group performance in organizational settings, including sports. However, there is still a need for the development of scales measuring this relationship in order to clarify the scientific shortcomings.

Objective: The current study analyzed the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports (T-CEQS).

Methods: The sample consisted of 522 college-age student-athletes (176 women, 346 men) from different universities in Turkey with a mean age of 21.40 years (SD = 2.11). The CEQS consists of 20 items, with five subscales. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factor structure. Pearson's product-moment coefficients were used to assess the correlations between the CEQS factors and the Collective Self-Efficacy Scale (CES). Cronbach's alphas were calculated for the subscales in order to evaluate their internal consistency.

Results: The results confirm the 5-factor internal structure of the T-CEQS. The results of the correlation analysis between the T-CEQS subscales and the CES indicated significant and positive relationships. We also found acceptable values of the alpha coefficient (between .70 and .85), which confirms the T-CEQS as a reliable instrument.

Conclusions: The T-CEQS is a relatively short questionnaire that allows researchers to measure team efficacy beliefs across sports. It also is a multidimensional state measure, based on current capabilities, not potential capabilities or expected future capabilities. The present findings provide preliminary support for the utility of the T-CEQS as a measure for assessing collective efficacy in Turkish sport teams prior to competitions.

Keywords: efficacy belief, team confidence, team sports, measurement, scale development

Received: November 10, 2017; Accepted: March 10, 2018; Prepublished online: March 26, 2018; Published: March 31, 2018Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Öncü, E., Feltz, D.L., Lirgg, C.D., & Gürbüz, B. (2018). The examination of the psychometric properties of the Turkish Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports. Acta Gymnica48(1), 27-35. doi: 10.5507/ag.2018.005.
Download citation


  1. Aria, H. (2011). Collective efficacy for psychological performance and correlation factors among Japanese athletes. Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences, 56, 229-238. Go to original source...
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  4. Boughattas, W., & Kridis, N. (2017). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in Tunisian sports teams: Validation of the Tunisian version of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Collective Sports. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 5, 46-59. Go to original source...
  5. Bridley, A. S. (2013). The impact of a dance aerobics program on middle school girls' physical activity level, self-efficacy,and decisional balance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS.
  6. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. L. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  7. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  8. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & R. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  9. Büyüköztürk, ª. (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi (9. Basim) [Data analysis handbook for social sciences (9th ed.)]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
  10. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. Go to original source...
  12. Cureton, E. E., & D'Agostino, R. B. (1983). Factor analysis: An applied approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  13. Duarte, R. (2008). Analyze of the ball possession during the offensive process in indoor soccer - contribute to determine the collective efficiency. Motricidade, 4(2), 77-82.
  14. Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A. (1998). The measurement of self-efficacy and confidence in sport. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 63-78). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  15. Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564. Go to original source...
  16. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  17. Fransen, K., Kleinert, J., Dithurbide, L., Vanbeselaere, N., & Boen, F. (2014). Collective efficacy or team outcome confidence? Development and validation of the Observational Collective Efficacy Scale for Sports (OCESS). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45, 121-137.
  18. Fransen, K., Vanbeselaere, N., Exadaktylos, V., Vande Broek, G., De Cuyper, B., Berckmans, D., … Boen, F. (2012). "Yes, we can!": Perceptions of collective efficacy sources in volleyball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 641-649. Go to original source...
  19. Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as mediators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832. Go to original source...
  20. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 711-725. Go to original source...
  21. Heuze, J. P., Raimbault, N., & Fontayne, P. (2006). Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 59-68. Go to original source...
  22. Hilland, T. A., Brown, T. D., & Fairclough, S. J. (2018). The physical education predisposition scale: Preliminary testsof reliability and validity in Australian students. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36, 384-392.
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Go to original source...
  24. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  25. Kawazu, K., Sugiyama, Y., & Nakasuga, T. (2012). An investigation of the changing relationship between the collective efficacy and team performance of a sport team for different sporting events. Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology, 39, 153-167. Go to original source...
  26. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
  27. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  28. Magyar, T. M., Feltz, D. L., & Simpson, I. P. (2004). Individual and crew level determinants of collective efficacy in rowing. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 136-153. Go to original source...
  29. Manley, D. (2008). Self-efficacy, physical activity, and aerobic fitness in middle school children: Examination of a pedometer intervention program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
  30. Marsh, H. W. (1998). Foreword. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. xv-xix). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  31. Martinez, J. R., Guillen, F., & Feltz, D. L. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Psicothema, 23, 503-509. Go to PubMed...
  32. Myers, N. D., & Feltz, D. L. (2007). From self-efficacy to collective efficacy in sport: Transitional issues. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 799-819). New York, NY: Wiley.
  33. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  34. Ocel, H. (2002). The role of self-efficacy, collective efficacy beliefs and cohesiveness in predicting players' evaluations of their teams' past present performance and future performance expectancies (Unpublished master dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  35. Paskevich, D. M., Brawley, L. R., Dorsch, K. D., & Widemeyer, W. N. (1999). Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 210-222. Go to original source...
  36. Peterson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11, 261-275. Go to original source...
  37. Ramzaninezhad, R., Keshtan, M. H., Shahamat, M. D., & Kordshooli, S. S. (2009). The relationship between collective efficacy, group cohesion, and team performance in professional volleyball teams. Brazilian Journal of Biometricity, 3, 31-39.
  38. Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793-802. Go to original source...
  39. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  40. Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181-202. Go to original source...
  41. Spence, J. C., Blanchard, C. M., Clark, M., Plotnikoff, R. C., Storey, K. E., & McCargar, L. (2010). The role of self-efficacy in explaining gender differences in physical activity among adolescents: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 176-183. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Tavsancil, E. (2002). Tutumlarin olcülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
  43. Uchida, R., Machida, M., Tsuchiya, H., & Kugihara, N. (2014). Revision and Japanese translation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports: Test of its construct validity. Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences, 59, 841-854. Go to original source...
  44. Vargas-Tonsing, T., & Bartholomew, J. B. (2006). An exploratory study of the effects of pregame speeches on team efficacy beliefs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 918-933. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.